Comparision between two historical approaches of

Korean literature The tradition of Korean historiography was established with the Samguk Sagia history of Korea from its allegedly earliest times. It was completed in and relied not only on earlier Chinese histories for source material, but also on the Hwarang Segi written by the Silla historian Kim Daemun in the 8th century. The latter work is now lost.

Comparision between two historical approaches of

Major researchers[ edit ] Some commentators have identified three waves of historical comparative research. For PhD dissertations this can be an approach used.

One example is comparing communities and minorities and social groups. Mordechai Zaken compared two non-Muslim minorities in Kurdistan, the Jews and the Assyrian Christians in their relationships with their Muslim rulers and tribal chieftains during the 19th and 20th centuries.

His comparative study gave a much clearer picture on the status of the minorities and their relationships with the ruling elites in and around Kurdistan. His PhD dissertation and the online book upon which it was based have been widely spread and translated into the local languages in Kurdistan and the surrounding.

These are archival data, secondary sources, running records, and recollections. The archival data, or primary sources, are typically the resources that researchers rely most heavily on.

Archival data includes official documents and other items that would be found in archives, museums, etc. Secondary sources are the works of other historians who have written history. Running records are ongoing series of statistical or other sorts of data, such as census data, ship's registries, property deeds, etc.

Finally recollections include sources such as autobiographies, memoirs or diaries. Historical data is a difficult set of data to work with due to multiple factors.

This data set can be very biased, such as diaries, memoirs, letters, which are all influenced not only by the person writing them, that person's world view but can also, logically, be linked to that individual's socioeconomic status.

Historical data regardless or whether it may or may not be biased diaries vs. Time can destroy fragile paper, fade ink until it is illegible, wars, environmental disasters can all destroy data and special interest groups can destroy mass amounts of data to serve a specific purpose at the time they lived, etc.

Hence, data is naturally incomplete and can lead social scientists to many barriers in their research. Often historical comparative research is a broad and wide reaching topic such as how democracy evolved in three specific regions.

Comparision between two historical approaches of

Tracking how democracy developed is a daunting task for one country or region let alone three. Here the scale of the social system, which is attempting to be studied, is overwhelming but also the complexity is extreme.

Within each case there are multiple different social systems that can affect the development of a society and its political system.

The factors must be separated and analyzed so that causality can be attained.

Philosophy of History (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)

It is causality that brings us to yet another key issue in methods for historical comparative research, the nature of the questions which are asked is attempting to propose causal relationships between a set of variables.

Determining causality alone is a difficult task; coupled with the incomplete nature of historical data and the complexity and scale of the social systems being used to examine causality the task becomes even more challenging.

Identifying features[ edit ] The three identifying issues of historical comparative research are causal relationships, processes over time, and comparisons. Schutt discusses the five criteria, which must be met in order to have a causal relationship. Of the five the first three are the most important: Association simply means that between two variables; the change in one variable is related to the change in another variable.

Comparision between two historical approaches of

Time order refers to the fact that the cause the independent variable must be shown to have occurred first and the effect the dependent variable to have occurred second.

Nonspuriousness says that the association between two variables is not because of a third variable.Comparison Contrast Essay Between Two Famous Historical Figures Compare and Contrast This type of writing assignment is common On a standardized test, you may be asked to analyze literature, evaluate ideas, or make a judgment and explain your reasons.

In responding to these types of prompts, you often will compare and contrast . As for semantically, the comma notation is used to produce a CARTESIAN product between two tables, which means produce a matrix of all records from table A with all records from table B, so two tables with 4 and 6 records respectively produces 24 records.

Comparision Between Two Historical Approaches of Early Islam Essay The two articles not only refer to the experiences of the same individual, they focus on different periods in the lifetime of the individual in question.

Understanding Society: Historical comparisons

One of the most common is the comparison/contrast essay, in which you focus on the ways in which certain things or ideas—usually two of them—are similar to (this is the comparison) and/or different from (this is the contrast) one another.

Feb 09,  · Comparative history is the comparison between different societies at a given time or sharing similar cultural conditions.

Proponents of this approach include American historians Barrington Moore and Herbert E.

Bolton; British historians Arnold Toynbee and Geoffrey Barraclough; and German historian Oswald Spengler. Comparison and contrast essay Comparison and contrast essay is one of the most common assignments in American high schools and universities. In this type of essay students have to compare two (in some essays several) things, problems, events or ideas and evaluate their resemblances and differences.

Historiography - Wikipedia